Related papers: Comment on "Disassembling the Clockwork Mechanism"

This paper considers a new and deeply challenging face of the problem of time in the context of cosmology drawing on the work of Thiemann (2006, 2007). Thiemann argues for a radical response to the cosmic problem of time that requires us to…

A review of new aspects concerning time-symmetry in Quantum Mechanics.

We comment on a priority claim given by the authors of Phys.Rev.C91 (2015) 6, 064311.

We clarify a number of points raised in [Matias, arXiv:cond-mat/0507471v2 (2005)].

We comment the recent published article entitled "Temperature dependent fluctuations in the two-dimensional XY model", appeared in J. Phys. A: Math.Gen. 38 (2005) 5603.

We reply to arXiv:1508.00203 `Comment on "Identifying Functional Thermodynamics in Autonomous Maxwellian Ratchets" (arXiv:1507.01537v2)'.

Since the introduction and the public availability of the \textsc{ucr} time series benchmark data sets, numerous Time Series Classification (TSC) methods has been designed, evaluated and compared to each others. We suggest a critical view…

Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)

An alternative proof is given for the main result of the article referred to in the title and published in ECP (2024). The proof exploits the theory of regenerative composition structures due to Gnedin and Pitman. The present article is a…

The content of this paper is now available as part of arXiv:0802.2019

Three comments on a recent paper entitled ``Macroscopic surface charges from microscopic simulations'' [J. Chem. Phys. 153, 164709 (2020)]

This paper has excessive overlap with the following papers also written by the authors or their collaborators: hep-th/0505013 and 0705.2930.

In this paper, we respond to a recent criticism of our work on CSH, (1,2) raised by Hirsch and van der Marel on the arXiv (3). We point out that their non-peer reviewed critique (3) stems from either a lack of scientific understanding or a…

We comment on the validity of Noether's theorem and on the conclusions of [J. Math. Phys. 61 (2020), no. 11, 113502].

In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. A 77, 062511 (2008)], it was advocated to modify the variational principle for the action-integral functional in the Runge-Gross foundation of time-dependent density-functional theory. This was criticised in a…

This is a comment on the paper arXiv:1410.2840 by Ji and Jin, to appear in the AOAS.

In this comment we answer to the recent critique of our article [arXiv:2208.11793] about Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) by Aur\'elien Drezet [arXiv:2209.01237]. Here we point out that our critical analysis of RQM was precisely based on…

This is a comment to a letter by D. Mandal, K. Klymko and M. R. DeWeese published as Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 258001 (2017).

We critically analyze a recent paper by D. Mermin and we compare his statements with Bell's position on the problems he is discussing.

Reply to the Comment [arXiv:1609.04476] on a recent work in PRL [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 036601 (2016), arXiv:1511.02994v2].