Related papers: Corrigendum to "Model Theory of Fields with Virtua…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a crucial mistake in Lemma 2
In the paper it is demonstrated that Bells theorem is an unprovable theorem.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due an error involving the weak* convergence argument in section 2
We withdraw this paper due to insufficient arguments in the derivation of Theorem 1. See quant-ph/0005062 for the new paper
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of Theorem 6.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to extremely unscientific errors.
Corollary 2.3 in our paper "A geometric proof of the Karpelevich-Mostow theorem", Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 41 (2009), no. 4, 634-638, is false. Here we give a counterexample and show how to avoid the use of this corollary to give a simpler…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of Proposition 4.8.
There have been gaps found in the proofs. The paper is withdrawn until further notice.
This paper was withdrawn by the authors. The mistake in math.AG/0209223 affects also this paper.
The paper is withdrawn due to mistakes in the proofs for Proposition 1.2 and Theorem 2.2.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the proof of Theorem 1.
We study notions of (virtual) group knowledge and group belief within multi-agent evidence models, obtained by extending the topological semantics of evidence-based belief and fallible knowledge from individuals to groups. We completely…
This paper has been withdrawn due to a error in Theorem 3.1.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to it being fundamentally flawed. The author apologizes for any inconvenience it may have caused.
In this extended abstract, we carefully examine a purported counterexample to a postulate of iterated belief revision. We suggest that the example is better seen as a failure to apply the theory of belief revision in sufficient detail. The…
It is shown that the condition of Theorem 1 in [1] never holds in practice and that Theorem 2 is incorrect under the stated condition. Extra assumptions or/and modifications are needed to make the conclusions of Theorem 1 and 2 above valid,…
The paper has been withdrawn due to an error in the main theorem.
This paper is withdrawn because of an error in Lemma 3.1
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because M. Aschenbrenner pointed out that the proof of theorem 3.1 was incorrect.