Related papers: Correction to the paper "Some remarks on Davie's u…
In this note we document a gap in an argument in the above paper, and point to new work in the literature giving a complete proof of the main result.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a sheaf-theoretic error, in the end of the proof of the main theorem.
New title and minor adjustments. To appear in the Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra
This paper is being withdrawn because an error was discovered in lemma 4.3. Although the rest of the paper appears to be correct, this error invalidates the proof of theorem 3.1 and theorem 3.3.
The paper presents a counterexample to the Hodge conjecture.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a critical error in the proof of Theorem 5.4 on which the proof of the main theorem on the non-simplenss was based.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because the paper is largely revised and improved, and to appear in Mechanics Research Communications.
This note corrects conditions in Proposition 3.4 and Theorem 5.2(ii) and comments on imprecisions in Propositions 4.2 and 4.4 in Fissler and Ziegel (2016).
Lemma 4.8 in the article [Regularity structures and renormalisation of FitzHugh-Nagumo SPDEs in three space dimensions, Electronic J. Probability 21 (18):1-48 (2016), arXiv:1504.02953] contains a mistake, which implies a weaker regularity…
We give a short proof of a theorem of J.-E. Pin (theorem 1.1 below), which can be found in his thesis. The part of the proof which is my own (not Pin's) is a complete replacement of the same part in an earlier version of this paper.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in the proof of the main result.
Minor technical changes. Section 4 improved.
The statements of Main~Theorem~1.1 and Theorem~2.1 of the author's paper [\emph{Trans.\ Amer.\ Math.\ Soc.}\ {\bf 345} (1994) 577--594] should assume that $\Gamma $~is discrete and $G$~is connected. (Cors.~1.3, 5.6, and~5.8 are affected…
The paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to it being fundamentally flawed. The author apologizes for any inconvenience it may have caused.
Upon presenting the proof of Theorem 3.3 in "Maximal chains in $$ and ultrapowers of the integers" I discovered that it is not entirely correct and certainly some details should be added. I have therefore written an addendum to the paper…
The method of using rearrangements to give sufficient conditions for Fourier inequalities between weighted Lebesgue spaces is revisited. New results in the case q < p are established and a comparison between two known sufficient conditions…
The paper was withdrawn because of its significant overlap with a paper appeared recently.
We indicate that an argument of da Costa and Doria in fact proves P=NP. This observation makes their argument appear dubious. We isolate a weak version of one of their lemmas which would already prove P=NP. We point out that even this weak…
The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in Proof of Theorem 1.1.