Related papers: Reply to the comment on "Non-Normalizable Densitie…

We provide a reply to a comment by I. Goychuk arXiv:1708.04155, version v2 from 27 Aug 2017 (not under active consideration with Phys. Rev. Lett.), on our Letter E. Aghion, D. A. Kessler and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 260601 (2017).

A comment on the Letter by A. Rebenshtok, S. Denisov, P. H\"anggi, and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 112, 110601 (2014). It is shown that the recent claims that the particle distributions or densities can become non-normalizable in the…

Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.

We reply to L.P. Grishchuk's comment (gr-qc/9801011) on our paper ``The Influence of Cosmological Transitions on the Evolution of Density Perturbations'' (Phys. Rev. D 57, 3302, 1998). We show that his points of criticism are not correct.

The Comment to the Letter "Excitons in Molecular Aggregates with Levy Disorder: Anomalous Localization and Exchange Broadening of Optical Spectra" appeared in Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 259701 (submitted on November 28, 2011). I prepared the…

Gates et al (astro-ph/9606132) have raised several issues in their Comment on our Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 76, p.3886 (1996); astro-ph/9605001). We clarify these issues and show that our results are robust, and there is no…

Strong anomalous diffusion, where $\langle |x(t)|^q \rangle \sim t^{q \nu(q)}$ with a nonlinear spectrum $\nu(q) \neq \mbox{const}$, is wide spread and has been found in various nonlinear dynamical systems and experiments on active…

Comment on R. Planet, S. Santucci, J. Ortin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 094502 (2009) about the rescaling of the data and the data collapse. Reply to be found here.

We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review A, Vol. 101, 023843 (2020), raised by H. Schuermann and V. Serov in arXiv:2204.05846.

Two similar Minkowskian diffusions have been considered, on one hand by Barbachoux, Debbasch, Malik and Rivet ([BDR1], [BDR2], [BDR3], [DMR], [DR]), and on the other hand by Dunkel and H\"anggi ([DH1], [DH2]). We address here two questions,…

We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).

A recent paper [M. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190601 (2007)] has called attention to the fact that irreversibility is a broader concept than ergodicity, and that therefore the Khinchin theorem [A. I. Khinchin, Mathematical Foundations of…

A Comment on the Letter by Victor Gurarie and Alexander E. Lobkovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 178301 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

This is a reply to the comment to a letter by D. Mandal, K. Klymko and M. R. DeWeese published as Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 258001 (2017).

We argue whether physics of universal approach of Severyukhin et al. [arXiv:1703.05710] is approved.

We reply to a recent comment by Bhattacharya et. al. (cond-mat/9812290) on our previous Letter (PRL 81, 5640 (1998)).

We reply to David's comment (hep-lat/9504017) on our paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 74(1995)1920.

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

Reply to the comment by D.N. Aristov and A.G. Yashenkin (cond-mat/9612245) on PRL by Balatsky and Salkola (Phys. Rev. Lett., V76, 2386, (1996), cond-mat/9602034).

We make a couple of remarks on ``Comments'' due to A. Moroz which were addressed to our recent letter "Differential cross section for Aharonov-Bohm effect with non standard boundary conditions", Europhys. Lett. 44 (1998) 403.