Related papers: Reply to "Comment on the 'Decrease of the surface …
This short article is a reply to the comment from E.B. Sonin on our paper on the domain structure in a superconducting ferromagnet published in Phys. Rev. Lett..
We challenge the analysis and conclusions of the paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 141103 (2012) by V. Gharibyan on the tests of Planck-scale gravity with accelerators. The main objective of the Comment is the observation that the explored domain…
The authors of a recent Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 137001 (2006)] observed enhancement of the critical supercurrent of superconducting nanowires in external magnetic field. They attributed the obtained behavior to the presence of magnetic…
This reply tries to rectify some misunderstandings that are in our opinion contained in the Comment by Campostrini and Rossi, <hep-lat 99407008> on our paper <hep-lat 9407003>.
We show that results obtained in paper Foundations of Physics 33, No. 7, 1107 (2003), are not correct.
We provides quantitative agreement with the experiment of Ref [J.R.Sucking et al,Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 147401 (2004)], and can account for the effects of the finite conductivity with a small modification to the effective wavelength.
Some mathematically incorrect claims of Compagno and Persico in their reply (2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, 8965) to my comment on their recent paper on self-dressing and radiation reaction in classical electrodynamics are pointed out.
Superconducting niobium film cavities deposited on copper substrates (Nb/Cu) have suffered from strong field-dependent surface resistance, often referred to as the Q-slope problem, since their invention. We argue that the Q-slope may not be…
Comment on P. Walker, Nature 453 (2008) 864, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7197/full/453864a.html
A number of misleading or incorrect comments by C.Giunti on seven arXiv preprints that I have written on the theory of neutrino oscillations are discussed. The essential new features of my approach are also briefly reviewed
A recent e-print (cond-mat/0604532) presented a proposed Comment to Applied Physics Letters on our publication Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 162503 (2006), cond-mat/0603260. Here is our Response. As the proposed Comment has now been rejected by…
We comment on the paper A. Esposito, R. Krichevsky, and A. Nicolis, "Gravitational Mass Carried by Sound Waves", Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 084501 (2019). Our comment aims to avoid the confusion arisen in the scientific community and beyond on…
The change of resonance widths in an open system under a perturbation of its interior has been recently introduced by Fyodorov and Savin [Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 184101 (2012)] as a sensitive indicator of the nonorthogonality of resonance…
Comment on the paper Constitutive boundary conditions and paradoxes in nonlocal elastic nanobeams. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 121, 2017, 151-156 by G. Romano, R. Barretta, M. Diaco, and F. Marotti de Sciarra
We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Th\'eo S\'epulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.
First version: del Barco et al. submitted recently a comment [arXiv:0812.4070] on our latest Phys. Rev. Lett. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 237204 (2008)], claiming three basic mistakes. We show here that their claims are unjustified and based on…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. The authors have now written two separate papers, one theoretical (A. Smerzi, A. Trombettoni, P. G. Kevrekidis, and A. R. Bishop Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 170402 (2002)) and one experimental (F. S.…
Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.
We reply to S. Coen and T. Sylvestre's comment on our paper [Phys. Rev. A 80, 045803 (2009)] and make some additional remarks on our experimental results.
Recently, S.A.Mikhailov et al presented a theoretical study(cond-mat/0407364) concerning the electromagnetic response of a finite-width two-dimensional electron stripe. Surprisingly, in the above manuscript the magnetic field dependence of…