Related papers: Extensions of trivial inertial blocks
Error in proof of theorem 10.
The proofs of Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 4.1 in Le\~ao and Ohashi (2013) are incomplete. The reason is a wrong statement in Remark 2.2. The hypotheses and statements of Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 4.1 in Le\~ao and Ohashi (2013) remain…
Corollary 2.3 in our paper "A geometric proof of the Karpelevich-Mostow theorem", Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 41 (2009), no. 4, 634-638, is false. Here we give a counterexample and show how to avoid the use of this corollary to give a simpler…
Proposition~6.4 of the author's paper {\origpaper} is incorrect. This invalid proposition was used in the proof of Corollary~6.5, so we provide a new proof of the latter result.
There is a serious mistake in the proof.
There is an error in the proof of Proposition 3.7. Proposition 3.7 is needed for the proof of the main theorem.
We correct an error in Lemma 4.4 and its application in Theorem 4.5 in our paper ``Kudla's Modularity Conjecture and Formal Fourier-Jacobi Series''.
In the erratum we correct a mistake (due to a wrong choice of basic polynomial invariants over Z[1/2]) in the original paper (v1). Using the correct basic polynomial invariants we improve our results and bounds on the annihilator. We also…
Manfred Stelzer has pointed out that part of Corollary 4.5 of our paper "Topological nonrealization results via the Goodwillie tower approach to iterated loopspace homology" [Alg. Geo. Top. 8 (2008), 2109--2129] was not sufficiently proved,…
Reason for withdrawal: There is a serious mistake in the calculation of the divisor of the rational section used in the proof of Prop. 2.2.1., and with the correct value the argument does not work.
This replaces the previous version, by correcting an error in the proof of Theorem 1.4, that was pointed out by the referee.
This paper is being withdrawn because an error was discovered in lemma 4.3. Although the rest of the paper appears to be correct, this error invalidates the proof of theorem 3.1 and theorem 3.3.
This paper is withdrawn. We found a mistake in Lemma 4.1
This version corrects a wrong proof of Proposition 6.3.2 and simplifies the exposition in Section 6.
We correct the statements and proofs of the (auxiliary) Propositions 4.1 and 4.2 of our paper `Evaluation of motivic functions, non-nullity, and integrability in fibers' in Advances in Mathematics, Vol. 409, Part A, Paper No. 108635, 29…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in Lemma 3, making the (bijective) proof of Theorem 4 and Corollary 5 invalid (symmetry of k-nonnesting and k-noncrossing set partitions).
This is an erratum to the article: "Computation of maximal projection constants" (J. Funct. Anal., 277). The statement of Lemma 3.1(2) of that paper is incorrect. As a consequence of this the proof of Theorem 1.4 is incomplete. In this…
The purpose of this erratum and addendum is to correct the errors in [1]. It consists of five components: 1. Lemma 7.1 and Proposition 7.2 are wrong and discarded; 2. A new proof of existence $\lambda(\xi)$ in (7.1) without Proposition 7.2;…
We study a new extension formula for right Bol loops. We prove the necessary or sufficient conditions for the extension to be right Bol. We describe the most important invariants: right multiplication group, nuclei, and center. We show that…
We continue the work of [4, 2, 3], in which we discuss published assertions that are incorrect or incorrectly proven; that are severely limited or reduce to triviality; or that we improve upon.