Related papers: Reply to "Comment on Strangeness -2 hypertriton"

This paper has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators because of disputed claims of authorship among former collaborators

We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]

A Reply to the criticisms contained in astro-ph/9612003 is provided and a logical inconsistency in astro-ph/9612214 is pointed out.

The article is withdrawn. Its content is contained in the final version of arXiv:0805.1634.

We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).

In this final note we demonstrate that the authors of manuscripts arXiv:1210.2036, arXiv:1309.0405 and arXiv:1309.5513 use mathematical notations and notions sometimes in the standard meaning and sometimes in a sense which differs from the…

I now agree with conclusion of author that there is a problem with unitarity in discussed models.

In this paper, we pose many challenging conjectures on congruences involving binomial coefficients and Ap\'ery-like numbers.

This is a reply to Professor Yehia Comments in arXiv:1305.0026

This paper is a refutation of two researches by A. N. Sazonov on HZ Her and V1341 Cyg published in the Astronomy Reports (Vol. 55, p.p.142 and 230) in 2011. We analyzed his photometry along with other data collected in the literature and…

Our analysis based on analytical and numerical calculations leads to conclusion that the promising results obtained in [F. Bouchard, J. Harris, H. Mand, R. W. Boyd, and E. Karimi, Optica 3, 351, 2016] are questionable in several respects.

The paper is being withdrawn because of some theoretical inconsistencies.

We have reviewed the comment in [3], posted on arXiv.org concerning our recent work in [1]. We reply to the comment in this paper.

We reply to David's comment (hep-lat/9504017) on our paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 74(1995)1920.

This short note is an erratum to arXiv:1306.4304, correcting the proof of one of its main results. It includes some counterexamples regarding infinite-dimensional unipotent groups and affine spaces that may be of independent interest.

We reply to misleading claims made in a comment to our work by Birse and McGovern in arXiv:1708.09341.

Withdrawn by arXiv administration because the text and equations were plagiarized from chapter 10 of the BaBar Physics Book http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacreports/slac-r-504.html See also hep-ph/0304045

In this article we give a survey on open problems and conjectures concerning L^2-invariants. We cover the whole portfolio and not only certain aspects as they are considered in the previous more specialized (and within their scope more…

This paper has been withdrawn by author due to an error in the proof.

In this paper, we survey some recent results on the Artin conjecture and discuss some aspects for the Artin conjecture.