Related papers: Rejoinder to "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Res…
This results in this paper have been merged with the result in arXiv:1003.0167. The authors would like to withdraw this version. Please see arXiv:1008.5356 for the merged version.
We reply to Comment by J. Gemmer, L. Knipschild, R. Steinigeweg (arXiv:1712.02128) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017).
This letter is a comment on an article by T.C. Halsey and M.H. Jensen in Nature about using recurrence times as a reliable tool to estimate multifractal dimensions of strange attractors. Our aim is to emphasize that in the recent…
With the extensive use of digital devices, online experimental platforms are commonly used to conduct experiments to collect data for evaluating different variations of products, algorithms, and interface designs, a.k.a., A/B tests. In…
The aim of this note is to rebut some unsupported claims which cast suspicions on the results of the papers titled: "Extrinsic extinction cross-section in the multiple acoustic scattering by fluid particles," [J. Appl. Phys. 121, 144904…
This is a detailed answer to the criticism of my paper.
In the paper are proved theorems, which amplify the results of my paper "On the difference equation of Poincare type (Part 3)", Max-Plank-Institut fuer Mathematik, Bonn, Preprint Series, 2004, 09, 1-34.
In this note we improve the parameter $q$ that appears in Theorem 1 obtained by the author in [Math. Ineq. \& appl., Vol 19 (3) (2016), 1013-1030].
Ozdogan (Int. J. Quantum Chem., 92 (2003) 419) published formulas for evaluating the multielectron multicenter molecular integrals over Slater-type orbitals (STOs). It is demonstrated that the formulas presented in this work are not…
Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]
Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]
Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]
Discussion of "Multivariate quantiles and multiple-output regression quantiles: From $L_1$ optimization to halfspace depth" by M. Hallin, D. Paindaveine and M. Siman [arXiv:1002.4486]
Discussion of "Multivariate quantiles and multiple-output regression quantiles: From $L_1$ optimization to halfspace depth" by M. Hallin, D. Paindaveine and M. Siman [arXiv:1002.4486]
Discussion of "Multivariate quantiles and multiple-output regression quantiles: From $L_1$ optimization to halfspace depth" by M. Hallin, D. Paindaveine and M. Siman [arXiv:1002.4486]
Comment: Monitoring Networked Applications With Incremental Quantile Estimation [arXiv:0708.0302]
Comment: Monitoring Networked Applications With Incremental Quantile Estimation [arXiv:0708.0302]
Berry's phase, entry in the Compendium of Quantum Physics: Concepts, Experiments, History and Philosophy, ed. F. Weinert, K. Hentschel, D. Greenberger and B. Falkenburg (Springer), to appear
As a coauthor of the article mentioned in the title, I discuss the criticism in the comment of Aalseth et al. Part of the criticism is justified.
The aim of this short note is to give counterexamples to two results by D. Y. Gao [5, Th. 16], [4, Th. 2] and to improve a related result by S.-C. Fang, D. Y. Gao, R.-L. Sheu and S.-Y. Wu [1, Th. 3].