Related papers: Rejoinder to "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Res…
Rejoinder to "Multivariate quantiles and multiple-output regression quantiles: From $L_1$ optimization to halfspace depth" by M. Hallin, D. Paindaveine and M. Siman [arXiv:1002.4486]
Discussion of "Cross-Covariance Functions for Multivariate Geostatistics" by Genton and Kleiber [arXiv:1507.08017].
Rejoinder to ``The 2005 Neyman Lecture: Dynamic Indeterminism in Science'' [arXiv:0808.0620]
Rejoinder of "Instrumental Variables: An Econometrician's Perspective" by Guido W. Imbens [arXiv:1410.0163].
Rejoinder to ``Support Vector Machines with Applications'' [math.ST/0612817]
Rejoinder of "Estimating Random Effects via Adjustment for Density Maximization" by C. Morris and R. Tang [arXiv:1108.3234]
Rejoinder to ``Equi-energy sampler with applications in statistical inference and statistical mechanics'' by Kou, Zhou and Wong [math.ST/0507080]
Rejoinder of "A significance test for the lasso" by Richard Lockhart, Jonathan Taylor, Ryan J. Tibshirani, Robert Tibshirani [arXiv:1301.7161].
This is intended to appear as the introduction to "The CBM Physics Book: compressed baryonic matter in laboratory experiments" (ed. B. Friman, C. H\"ohne, S. Leupold, J. Knoll, J. Randrup, R. Rapp, P. Senger), to be published by Springer.…
Rejoinder of ``Objective Priors: An Introduction for Frequentists'' by M. Ghosh [arXiv:1108.2120]
Rejoinder: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]
Rejoinder of "Frequentist coverage of adaptive nonparametric Bayesian credible sets" by Szab\'o, van der Vaart and van Zanten [arXiv:1310.4489v5].
This is a complement to my previous article "Advanced Determinant Calculus" (S\'eminaire Lotharingien Combin. 42 (1999), Article B42q, 67 pp.). In the present article, I share with the reader my experience of applying the methods described…
Rejoinder to ``Boosting Algorithms: Regularization, Prediction and Model Fitting'' [arXiv:0804.2752]
This is a reply to a Comment on 'A test-tube model for rainfall', {\it Europhys. Lett.}, {\bf 106}, 40001, (2014).
New cases of the multiplicity conjecture are considered.
Comment on the Letter ``Polynomial-Time Simulation of Pairing Models on a Quantum Computer'', L. A. Wu, M. S. Byrd and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057904 (2002).
Rejoinder of "On the Birnbaum Argument for the Strong Likelihood Principle" by Deborah G. Mayo [arXiv:1302.7021].
Motivated by the practice of exploratory research, we formulate an approach to multiple testing that reverses the conventional roles of the user and the multiple testing procedure. Traditionally, the user chooses the error criterion, and…
Rejoinder: Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress [math.ST/0606441]