Related papers: Cliff-wall surgery and vanishing of basic phase fu…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the last paragraph of step 2 of the main proof, on page 6.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial i-number error in Eqn. 18.
We withdraw this paper due to insufficient arguments in the derivation of Theorem 1. See quant-ph/0005062 for the new paper
withdrawed due to a substantial error.
This paper has been withdrawn. The main technical result will reappear in the new version of quant-ph/0501003.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. It has been superseded by hep-th/0309154
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the use of the Cauchy-Kowalevski theorem in section 4., theorem 4.1 which does not allow to prove the final result. When (and if) this error will be cured it will be replaced by…
This paper has been withdrawn because Proposition 2.2 (c) is false. This invalids the main results of section 2 and 3. We thank A. Canonaco for pointing us the error.
Major mistake. The paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error estimate in Lemma 3.1.
This paper has been withdrawn
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial gap in the estimates for m>=4.
There is an error in the proof of Proposition 3.7. Proposition 3.7 is needed for the proof of the main theorem.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in conclusion .
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the computation of the central charge.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn. Please see cond-mat/0605124 for new and updated data and conclusions pertaining to this study.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the sufficient condition given for the proof of the Tate conjecture for Catanese surfaces.
this paper has been withdrawn. A crucial estimate on a Lipschitz variant of the Kakeya maximal function has an incomplete proof.