Related papers: Small Doubling and Additive Structure Modulo a Pri…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due an error in the proof of Proposion 2.13.
This paper has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of [math/0609208].
This paper has been withdrawn by the author because there are some typos in proofs.
This article has been withdrawn due to an error in a proof of the main result.
This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial theoretical error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the submission action.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due to an error in the proof of Lemma 3.1.
We withdraw this paper due to insufficient arguments in the derivation of Theorem 1. See quant-ph/0005062 for the new paper
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial argument error at p.10.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the gaps in the proofs of Proposition 2.2 and Proposition 3.2
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to errors in the figures.
This submission has been withdrawn at the request of the author.
This paper has been withdrawn, because I have merged it with paper I of the series, math.AG/0312190. The main results of this paper now appear in sections 7-9 of the revised version of math.AG/0312190, with shortened and improved proofs.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due a few mistakes in the paper.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a sheaf-theoretic error, in the end of the proof of the main theorem.
This paper has been withdrawn because Proposition 2.2 (c) is false. This invalids the main results of section 2 and 3. We thank A. Canonaco for pointing us the error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author. There is an error on page 3 in the last inequality before Lemma 1.1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to a crucial error in the proof of Thm.1
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the proofs. The error has been corrected and the paper has been expanded in arXiv:0910.5327