Related papers: @tComment: Testing Javadoc Comments to Detect Comm…

This paper has been withdrawn due to a critical error discovered in Theorem 4.21. Anyone with a historical or pragamatic interest in prior "negative results", however - e.g., failed proof attempts relating to the (in)consistency of ZF or…

Withdrawn -- a revised version will appear in due course.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to some mistakes

Software comments are critical for human understanding of software, and as such many comment generation techniques have been proposed. However, we find that a systematic evaluation of the factual accuracy of generated comments is rare; only…

This paper has been withdrawn due to disagreement of suggested results and methods between authors.

This paper was withdrawn by the authors.

This paper has been withdrawn due to an error, and no further revisions will be made.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial errors.

Natural language comments convey key aspects of source code such as implementation, usage, and pre- and post-conditions. Failure to update comments accordingly when the corresponding code is modified introduces inconsistencies, which is…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This submission has been withdrawn at the request of the author.

This paper was withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author. The most updated version can be accessed by arXiv:1806.07290.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to its publication

This paper has been withdrawn by the author

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because Lemma 3 is incorrect. This mistake is crucial in this paper.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, since it has been merged with Part I (ID 0802.3570)

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of Proposition 4.8.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial error in the data.