Related papers: Incomplete Kloosterman sums and Hooley's R$^*$-Con…
This paper has been withdrawn due to non-clearness of some technical points, as well as lack of a reasonable statement of quantization conjecture.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. We have discovered an error in the evaluation of the diagram, which invalidates our conclusion.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn because of serious errors.
This paper was withdrawn by the author due to an edition's rights
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake in the proof of the main theorem.
This paper is cancelled
This paper is withdrawn because of an error in Lemma 3.1
This paper was withdrawn by the authors. Lemma 5.1 is wrong.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to a crucial error in the proof of Thm.1
This paper is withdrawn by the author due to a critical error in the proof of the main theorem, Theorem 3.10. (More specifically the identity (5.18) is incorrect in that the $T^*S^1(2)$-factor is missing in the right hand side of the…
The paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to it being fundamentally flawed. The author apologizes for any inconvenience it may have caused.
This paper has been withdrawn due to a error in Theorem 3.1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a critical error in the proof of Theorem A pointed out by Burkhard Wilking.
This article has been withdrawn due to a mistake which is explained in version 2.
The paper is being withdrawn because of some theoretical inconsistencies.
The paper is withdrawn because the analysis appeared to be incomplete.
This paper has been withdrawn because there is a fundamental error in the computations; with the right computational scheme it seems to be just a version of the Jones polynomial
The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to unhappy mistake in the initial scope of the work.