Related papers: Comment on revised version of "The Hadamard circul…
This comment points out that the recent paper by Maki and Haas [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 020510 (2003)] is completely wrong.
This note imparts heuristic arguments and theorectical evidences that contradict the abc conjecture over the rational numbers. In addition, the rudimentary datails for transforming this problem into the doimain of equidistribution theory…
This is a reply to an article with the same title in which Kirkpatrick claimed that the considerations I put forward some thirty years ago on quantum mixtures are incorrect. It is shown here that Kirkpatrick's reasoning is erroneous.
The pseudo-circle is known to be nonhomogeneous. The original proofs of this fact were discovered independently by L. Fearnley and J.T. Rogers, Jr. The purpose of this paper is to provide an alternative, very short proof based on a result…
It is shown that an article by C. W. Misner contains serious errors. In particular, the claim that the Yilmaz theory of gravitation cancels the Newtonian gravitational interaction is based on a false premise. With the correct premise the…
We prove the Extended Delta Conjecture of Haglund, Remmel, and Wilson, a combinatorial formula for $\Delta _{h_l}\Delta' _{e_k} e_{n}$, where $\Delta' _{e_k}$ and $\Delta_{h_l}$ are Macdonald eigenoperators and $e_n$ is an elementary…
Corollary 2.3 in our paper "A geometric proof of the Karpelevich-Mostow theorem", Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 41 (2009), no. 4, 634-638, is false. Here we give a counterexample and show how to avoid the use of this corollary to give a simpler…
In the paper On the Existence of Hadamard Matrices in J. Combinatorial Theory 21, 1976, it is shown that for a natural number q > 3, we can construct an Hadamard Matrix of order 2^s q for s \geq t where t = [2 log_2(q-3)]. I will show that…
We survey most of the known results concerning the Eisenbud-Green-Harris Conjecture. Our presentation includes new proofs of several theorems, as well as a unified treatment of many results which are otherwise scattered in the literature.…
Samuely et al. (cond-mat/0503153) make the strong claim that our letter is 'contradicting several established experimental results'. As we will show below this is not justified and the claims from are based on a misinterpretation of our…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in Thm. 11.
The proofs of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.5(2) in the authors' paper 'The Hasse norm principle for abelian extensions' are incorrect. We point out the mistakes and provide correct proofs, using techniques of the original paper.
We prove that the Tate, Beilinson and Parshin conjectures are invariant under Homological Projective Duality (=HPD). As an application, we obtain a proof of these celebrated conjectures (as well as of the strong form of the Tate conjecture)…
We report the results of our empirical investigations on the Bateman-Horn conjecture. This conjecture, in its commonly known form, produces rather large deviations when the polynomials involved are not monic. We propose a modified version…
It is shown that theories already presented as rigorous mathematical formalizations of widespread manipulations of Dirac's delta function are all unsatisfactory, and a new alternative is proposed.
The recently developed proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is very lengthy and difficult, so much so as to be beyond all but a small body of specialists. While certainly of value in the developments that resulted, that proof could not be, nor…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of Theorem 1.
The calculation presented in "A neoclassical calculation of rotation profiles and comparison with DIII-D measurements" by Stacey, Johnson, and Mandrekas, [Physics of Plasmas, 13, (2006)], contains several errors, including the neglect of…
This article explains why a paper by Heinz G. Helfenstein entitled "Ovals with equichordal points", published in J.London Math.Soc.31, 54-57, 1956, is incorrect. We point out a computational error which renders his conclusions invalid. More…
This paper has been withdrawn since it is identical to the paper math.QA/0601267. It was posted by mistake.