Related papers: Tightening the eavesdropping accessible informatio…

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author

This paper has been withdrawn

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the incorrect argument for the security.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to the insecurity against attacks received in quant-ph/0605027v5.

Recently, Zhang, Li, and Guo have proposed a particular eavesdropping attack [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 63}, 036301 (2001), quant-ph/0009042] which shows that my quantum key distribution protocol based on entanglement swapping [Phys. Rev. A {\bf…

The paper has been withdrawn by the author because the result obtained has been reported earlier by other authors.

The paper is withdrawn.

A general proof of the security against eavesdropping of a previously introduced protocol for two-party quantum key distribution based on entanglement swapping [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 61}, 052312 (2000)] is provided. In addition, the protocol is…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, as it is now incorporated in 0901.4506 (v4)

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s).The scheme presented is insecure.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author since the protocol is not new. It is just the oldest version of BB84.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because the results obtained have been reported earlier by other authors.

The paper [Howard E. Brandt, "Conclusive eavesdropping in quantum key distribution," J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 7 (2005)] is generalized to include the full range of error rates for the projectively measured quantum cryptographic…

This paper has been withdrawn. See quant-ph/9806031 for a discussion.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.