Related papers: Rejoinder

Discussion of "Impact of Frequentist and Bayesian Methods on Survey Sampling Practice: A Selective Appraisal" by J. N. K. Rao [arXiv:1108.2356]

Discussion of "Impact of Frequentist and Bayesian Methods on Survey Sampling Practice: A Selective Appraisal" by J. N. K. Rao [arXiv:1108.2356]

This comment emphasizes the importance of model checking and model fitting when making inferences about finite population quantities. It also suggests the value of using unit level models when making inferences for small subpopulations,…

Rejoinder of "Bayesian Models and Methods in Public Policy and Government Settings" by S. E. Fienberg [arXiv:1108.2177]

Rejoinder: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]

According to Hansen, Madow and Tepping [J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 78 (1983) 776--793], "Probability sampling designs and randomization inference are widely accepted as the standard approach in sample surveys." In this article, reasons are…

Rejoinder of "Frequentist coverage of adaptive nonparametric Bayesian credible sets" by Szab\'o, van der Vaart and van Zanten [arXiv:1310.4489v5].

Rejoinder of "Estimating Random Effects via Adjustment for Density Maximization" by C. Morris and R. Tang [arXiv:1108.3234]

Rejoinder of ``Objective Priors: An Introduction for Frequentists'' by M. Ghosh [arXiv:1108.2120]

Rejoinder to ``Microarrays, Empirical Bayes and the Two-Groups Model'' [arXiv:0808.0572]

Rejoinder of "Calibrated Bayes, for Statistics in General, and Missing Data in Particular" by R. Little [arXiv:1108.1917]

Rejoinder to "Quantifying the Fraction of Missing Information for Hypothesis Testing in Statistical and Genetic Studies" [arXiv:1102.2774]

Rejoinder: Bayesian Checking of the Second Levels of Hierarchical Models [arXiv:0802.0743]

Rejoinder: Monitoring Networked Applications With Incremental Quantile Estimation [arXiv:0708.0302]

Rejoinder to ``Boosting Algorithms: Regularization, Prediction and Model Fitting'' [arXiv:0804.2752]

In this rejoinder we summarize the comments, questions and remarks on the paper "A novel algorithmic approach to Bayesian Logic Regression" from the discussants. We then respond to those comments, questions and remarks, provide several…

Rejoinder to "The Future of Indirect Evidence" [arXiv:1012.1161]

Rejoinder of "Statistical Inference: The Big Picture" by R. E. Kass [arXiv:1106.2895]

This article is the rejoinder for the paper "Probabilistic Integration: A Role in Statistical Computation?" to appear in Statistical Science with discussion. We would first like to thank the reviewers and many of our colleagues who helped…

Rejoinder to "Likelihood Inference for Models with Unobservables: Another View" by Youngjo Lee and John A. Nelder [arXiv:1010.0303]