Related papers: Retraction of 'Elementary proof of the Giuga-Agoh …
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to crucial error in the main proof (located in Section 2.4). The authors apologize for any inconveniences.
The paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial error in section 3.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the last paragraph of step 2 of the main proof, on page 6.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due an error in the proof of Proposion 2.13.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an erro thereon line -2 of page 4.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to an error in Section 7.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to a crucial error in page 5.
This paper has been withdrawn. See v1 still available to understand the problem: Proposition 2.2 is false. The error in the proof is in claim (3). Then, the whole paper collapses. We do not have any correction for now. We apologize to…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake in the proof of the main theorem.
withdrawed due to a substantial error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author because Conjecture 1 is false. Please see arXiv:0901.2093 for a justification that Conjecture 1 is false. The other main results are also available from the above URL.
There have been gaps found in the proofs. The paper is withdrawn until further notice.
This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial error in the proof of the main theorem
We do not know whether the main result is true, the proof of theorem 2.1 contains a gap.
This paper is cancelled
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in Thm. 11.
This paper has been withdrawn due to a critical error discovered in Theorem 4.21. Anyone with a historical or pragamatic interest in prior "negative results", however - e.g., failed proof attempts relating to the (in)consistency of ZF or…
A mistake is pointed out in EGA I, Elements of algebraic geometry, concerning corollary (2.4.4) which is not correct. Quite likely, the hitch has already been noticed, and reported, but we know not who, nor where. New research is…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a gap in the proof of the main Theorem.