Related papers: A remark on the abundance conjecture

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to an error in the main theorem.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of Theorem 1.

This paper was withdrawn by the author due to an edition's rights

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation (5).

This paper has been withdrawn due a crucial mistake due to a crucial mistake in the proof of Lemma 2.3.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a critical error near equation (71). This error causes the entire argument of the paper to collapse. Emmanuel Candes of Stanford discovered the error, and has suggested a correct analysis, which will be…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because there are some typos in proofs.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to some errors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because overcame by arXiv:0910.4694

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, because of a crucial gap in the proof of the main theorem.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

The paper is withdrawn due to an error in Section 2.

This paper has been withdrawn

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to imprecisions which must conduce to wrong results.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author: it was a too preliminary version.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn as the result is not correct.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in Eqn. 1.