Related papers: Comment on "Towards a bulk theory of flexoelectric…

Invited contribution to Annalen der Physik (Expert Opinion).

This is a reply to a Comment on 'A test-tube model for rainfall', {\it Europhys. Lett.}, {\bf 106}, 40001, (2014).

Reply to the comment, cond-mat/0209398 by by N.W. Watkins, S.C. Chapman, and G. Rowlands

This is a comment on the recent letter by Wang and Brady on "Constant stress and pressure rheology of colloidal suspensions", Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 158301 (2015).

A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

We offer o reply for the comments of Rapisarda et al. cond-mat/0601409 on our letter "Entropy of Classical Systems with Long Range Interactios", published in Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol 95 (2005) 190601.

The various versions of cond-mat/0312353 discuss results obtained by me&coworkers in the last decade. I have received requests to comment on the paper and the comments are collected here, including some that I tried to point in the course…

Comment on the computational work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 135506 (2004)].

A Comment on the Letter by Granger et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 135506 (2002).

This is a Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0807.0699] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)].

A review article on perturbation theory

We comment on the paper A. Esposito, R. Krichevsky, and A. Nicolis, "Gravitational Mass Carried by Sound Waves", Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 084501 (2019). Our comment aims to avoid the confusion arisen in the scientific community and beyond on…

This is a comment on Chen et al Letter PRL,100, 232002 (2008).

Comment on cond-mat/0205390; PRL 90, 026805 (2003)

The Comment by Holas et al. [A. Holas, M. Cinal, and N. H. March, Phys. Rev. A 78, 016501 (2008)] on our recent paper [J. Schirmer and A. Dreuw, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022513 (2007)]. is an appropriate and valuable contribution. As a small…

The Comment by Duval et al. [PRL 96, 099701 (2006)] addresses an important, but not the main, result of our Letter [PRL 95, 137204 (2005)]. It does not contradict our results in substance, and the only objection is really on the style of…

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

Flexoelectricity is the linear response of polarization to a strain gradient. Here we address the simplest class of dielectrics, namely elemental cubic crystals, and we prove that therein there is no extrinsic (i.e. surface) contribution to…

Comment on ``Tests of scaling and universality of the distributions of trade size and share volume: Evidence from three distinct markets" by Plerou and Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 76, 046109 (2007)

We make comments on Gaidarzhy {\it et al.}'s [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 94, 030402 (2005)] letter.