Related papers: Introducing the discussion paper by Sz\'{e}kely an…

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

Discussion on "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'{a}bor J. Sz\'{e}kely and Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]

Discussion on "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'{a}bor J. Sz\'{e}kely and Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]

Discussion on "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'{a}bor J. Sz\'{e}kely and Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]

Discussion on "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'{a}bor J. Sz\'{e}kely, Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]

Discussion on "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'{a}bor J. Sz\'{e}kely, Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]

Discussion on "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'abor J. Sz\'ekely and Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

In this short note, we briefly comment on the analytical bounds that must be imposed on the parameter space of the Rezzolla-Zhidenko (RZ) metric-parametrization approach introduced in Ref. [1]. We hope this will clarify some of the…

This is a comment on the recent paper by O.V. Selyugin, J.-R. Cudell, and E. Predazzi "Analytic properties of different unitarization schemes" arXiv: 0712.0621v2, [hep-ph]

We answer a question of Zadrozny.

Rejoinder to "Brownian distance covariance" by G\'abor J. Sz\'ekely and Maria L. Rizzo [arXiv:1010.0297]

Introduction to papers on the modeling and analysis of network data

We explain the Elekes Szabo paper in more details and improve the constant in one dimensional case in \mathbb{R} and \mathbb{C}.

This is a reply to a comment by P. Schlottmann and A.A. Zvyagin.

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

The paper presents several new sufficient conditions, as well as new equivalent criteria for the classical Riemann Hypothesis. Noteworthy are also other statements and remarks about $\zeta$ to be found throughout the paper.

This note is the follow up to a paper by M. Waldschmidt.

This is a celebratory and pedagogical discussion of Sturm oscillation theory. Included is the discussion of the difference equation case via determinants and a renormalized oscillation theorem of Gesztesy, Teschl, and the author.

We remark on the validity of the concerns raised in the comment(cond-mat/0304626) by Fal'ko, Lerner, Tsyplyatyev, and Aleiner..