Related papers: Important authorship clarification for arXiv:1010.…
This submission has been withdrawn by arXiv admins because it contains inappropriate, fictitious text in the acknowledgments and the final reference.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. Because of a misunderstanding, the paper was submitted prematurely to the arXiv. A replacement will follow.
This paper has been withdrawn by author due to an error in the proof.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a crucial mistake in proof of lemma 4.2.
Replaced by the new article arXiv:0901.1425 because the J\"uttner distribution has been revised and the second author been removed.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. Significantly revised versions of the results of this paper are now available in arXiv:0707.0487v2 and arXiv:0808.3169v1.
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn.
Authorship Verification (AV) (do two documents have the same author?) is essential in many real-life applications. AV is often used in privacy-sensitive domains that require an offline proprietary model that is deployed on premises, making…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in conclusion .
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s). Please see arXiv:0711.3910 for revision.
withdrawn by author
The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in Proof of Theorem 1.1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to a crucial error in page 5.
This paper has been withdrawn
This paper is a revised version of a previously posted paper in arxiv. The authors posted it as a new submission by mistake. The latest version of the paper can be found at arXiv:math-ph/0512003v2
This submission has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators because of inappropriate authorship claims.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to an error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to errors and bad formalization.
Writers read Einstein's letter to Mari\'c from 1901 in which he wrote: "bringing our work on relative motion to a successful conclusion!" What came afterwards was boosted by a claim that Joffe had seen the original relativity paper…