Related papers: Response to arXiv:1005.2615
We reply to P. Forg\'acs, T. Herpay, and P. Kov\'acs (arXiv: 1202.6289).
In reply to the Comment by Ramasubramaniam regarding our article [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 81}, 241412(R) (2010)] we clarify that our results are indeed valid provided that out-of-plane atomic relaxations are inhibited, as it may occur in the…
Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".
This is a reply to a comment on the paper arXiv:1204.2075 "Are stress-free membranes really tensionless ?" (EPL 95,28008 (2011)).
This is a draft of my brief note on the early history of $n\bar{n}$ oscillations written for the Project X at the request of Chris Quigg in March 2013.
Recent results in the field of Heavy Quarkonia are reviewed, with results either providing new precision measurements or addressing key unanswered questions.
We reply to the recent comment cond-mat/9810097 on our original Letter `Roughening Transition of Interfaces in Disordered Systems', Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1469 (1998).
This paper has been withdrawn because the content has been substantially improved in a later paper, arXiv:0806.1165.
This is a comment on the paper arXiv:1410.2840 by Ji and Jin, to appear in the AOAS.
Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].
Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].
I present a review of X-ray observations of supernova remnants with an emphasis on shell-type remnants. The topics discussed are the observation of fresh nucleosynthesis products, shock heating and cosmic ray acceleration.
This submission is a comment on an article that had previously appeared in Phys. Rev. Lett.
The author reports his recollections of what transpired. These may or may not prove consistent with the contributions to be published in the proceedings. Corrections are welcome.
This reply contains a brief response to the comment by R. Howl, D. R\"atzel, and I. Fuentes [arXiv:1811.10306]
This is a reply to a comment on our work recently posted in arXiv. To our knowledge, this comment has not been published anywhere else. We show that the points raised in the comment are invalid
The status of some of the recently discovered heavy hadrons is presented.
This is the reply to the comment arXiv:0810.4452 by Kofler, Ursin, Brukner, and Zeilinger.
This paper is a reply to "On Salum's Algorithm for X3SAT" (arXiv:2104.02886)
In their Rejoinder [arXiv:1105.1316v1], Levin and Pakter repeat some of the points raised in their previous Comment [arXiv:1104.0697v1] (already refuted in our first Reply [arXiv:1104.5036v1]), and present some new ones concerning our…