Related papers: A proof of Hamilton's conjecture

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This article has been withdrown by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to an error in the proof of lemma 7.4. However, numerical evidence strongly suggest that this lemma is true.

A modified version of this paper is under process and with a new title and abstract. Hence, this version of the article is completely withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s)

This paper is withdrawn by the author due to a critical error in the proof of the main theorem, Theorem 3.10. (More specifically the identity (5.18) is incorrect in that the $T^*S^1(2)$-factor is missing in the right hand side of the…

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.

This article was withdrawn by the arXiv.org administrators since it plagiarizes math.AT/0401211.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error

This paper was withdrawn. It has been superseded by the latest version of hep-th/0107069.

This paper is withdrawn. See quant-ph/9806031 for a discussion.

This paper has been withdrawn due a crucial mistake due to a crucial mistake in the proof of Lemma 2.3.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author since the comments have been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s).The scheme presented is insecure.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the proof of Lemma 2.2.

This paper has been withdrawn by the corresponding author because the newest version is now published in Journal of Discrete Algorithms.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s)

This paper has been withdrawn because of serious errors.