English
Related papers

Related papers: Comment: Citation Statistics

200 papers

Discussion of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' by Andrey Feuerverger [arXiv:0804.0079]

Applications · Statistics 2008-12-18 Sheila M. Bird

The paper comments on "Quantifying long-term scientific impact". It indicates that there is a mistake of [D. S. Wang , C. Song, A. L. Barabasi, Quantifying long-term scientific impact, Science 342, 127 (2013), arXiv:1306.3293].

Digital Libraries · Computer Science 2014-05-16 Jin-Li Guo , Qi Suo

A few final comments on arXiv:1210.7548 are given to confute incorrect arguments claimed there.

Comment on "Indispensable Finite Time Correlations for Fokker-Planck Equations from Time Series Data"

Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability · Physics 2009-11-07 R. Friedrich , Ch. Renner , M. Siefert , J. Peinke

We respond to the criticism raised in the paper arXiv:1704.07831.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Physics 2017-05-30 Gian F. Giudice , Matthew McCullough

Comment on cond-mat/0205390; PRL 90, 026805 (2003)

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Physics 2007-05-23 U. Eckern , P. Schwab , V. Ambegaokar

It has been shown (S. Lawrence, 2001, Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System…

Comment on Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress--Credit Scoring [math.ST/0606441]

Statistics Theory · Mathematics 2007-06-13 Ross W. Gayler

In the recently posted arXiv:2312.04495v3 [1], its authors used a computer code written by me supplied to them by the authors of Ref. [2], and claimed that the results that they obtained invalidate the results and conclusions presented in…

Superconductivity · Physics 2024-01-18 J. E. Hirsch

We here describe and present results of a simple neural network that predicts individual researchers' future citation counts based on a variety of data from the researchers' past. For publications available on the open access-server…

Digital Libraries · Computer Science 2019-08-09 Tobias Mistele , Tom Price , Sabine Hossenfelder

Discussion of "Statistical Inference: The Big Picture" by R. E. Kass [arXiv:1106.2895]

Methodology · Statistics 2011-06-17 Andrew Gelman

We have reviewed the comment in [3], posted on arXiv.org concerning our recent work in [1]. We reply to the comment in this paper.

Quantum Physics · Physics 2012-05-08 D. Li , X. Li , H. Huang , X. Li

Discussion of "The Future of Indirect Evidence" by Bradley Efron [arXiv:1012.1161]

Methodology · Statistics 2010-12-08 Andrew Gelman

We clarify a number of points raised in [Matias, arXiv:cond-mat/0507471v2 (2005)].

Disordered Systems and Neural Networks · Physics 2007-05-23 S. Boccaletti , M. Chavez , A. Amann , D. -U. Hwang

I comment on the paper hep-th/9808013 by A. Berkovich and B.M. McCoy.

High Energy Physics - Theory · Physics 2007-05-23 K. Schoutens

We study the statistics of citations from all Physical Review journals for the 110-year period 1893 until 2003. In addition to characterizing the citation distribution and identifying publications with the highest citation impact, we…

Physics and Society · Physics 2007-05-23 S. Redner

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

Strongly Correlated Electrons · Physics 2007-05-23 S. de Palo , M. Botti , S. Moroni , Gaetano Senatore

Reply to Comment on 'Length Scale Dependence of DNA Mechanical Properties'

Biomolecules · Quantitative Biology 2013-10-15 Agnes Noy , Ramin Golestanian

A compendium for outsiders.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Physics 2022-05-04 Chris Quigg

We established in an earlier study that articles listed at or near the top of the daily arXiv:astro-ph mailings receive on average significantly more citations than articles further down the list. In our earlier work we were not able to…

Astrophysics · Physics 2009-11-13 J. P. Dietrich
‹ Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 10 Next ›