Related papers: Convex Multiview Fisher Discriminant Analysis

The paper is withdrawn because the analysis appeared to be incomplete.

This paper has been withdrawn. It was an early draft submitted prematurely in error. A complete version is to be submitted shortly.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an erro thereon line -2 of page 4.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because the paper is largely revised and improved, and to appear in Mechanics Research Communications.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the definition of homomorphism.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author. There is an error on page 3 in the last inequality before Lemma 1.1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in an inequality in the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Wrong assumptions were made in the proof of Theorem 3.12 and Lemma 3.6. A preprint containing a correct proof for Lemma 3.6 is in preparation and will be uploaded later this month. So the results of section 3 are correct, apart from Theorem…

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, since it has been merged with Part I (ID 0802.3570)

The paper is withdrawn due to an error in Section 3.2. The remaining of the results are included in the preprint solv-int/9605004.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to incomplete interpretation for the results.

This paper has been withdrawn due to crucial erros in equations (24)--(31).

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a crucial error in the main idea.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial error in the proof of the main theorem

This article has been withdrawn due to an error in a proof of the main result.

This manuscript has been removed duo to incorrect contents.

This paper has been withdrawn.

Unfortunately, after an imprudent sumbission of the paper to the e-print archive, I discovered in it many serious mistakes. So I draw back it .

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because Lemma 3 is incorrect. This mistake is crucial in this paper.