Related papers: A note on general no-cloning theorem for black box…

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial theoretical error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in Theorem 3.4.

This paper has been withdrawn, because the result turned out to be well known.

The paper is withdrawn by the author because it is superseded by cond-mat/0303357 .

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in equations 39 and 41.

The paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due the final version in math.QA/0604564

The paper has been withdrawn

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because in the main text some discussion parts were inadvertently added by mistake.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This submission has been withdrawn at the request of the author.

This paper has been withdrawn because there is a fundamental error in the computations; with the right computational scheme it seems to be just a version of the Jones polynomial

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial error in the data.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s).The scheme presented is insecure.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, as it is now incorporated in 0901.4506 (v4)

Paper has been withdrawn due to a critical error in the numerical evaluation of the capture fraction.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a sheaf-theoretic error, in the end of the proof of the main theorem.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author