Related papers: Simon's conjecture for fibered knots

This note explains an error in Proposition 5.1 of "Fibers of tropicalization," Math. Z. 262 (2009), no. 2, 301-311, discovered by W. Buczynska and F. Sottile, and fills the resulting gap in the proof of the paper's main theorem.

The paper has been withdrawn.

%auto-ignore This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, and instead we have replaced hep-ph/9807214 by this new version.

%auto-ignore The paper has been withdrawn by authors. The completely revised version can be found under the following preprint-no: hep-ph/9910282.

The volume conjecture, formulated recently by H. Murakami and J. Murakami, is proved for the case of torus knots.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author [arXiv admin].

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to necessity of revision.

This paper is withdrawn. See quant-ph/9806031 for a discussion.

I could not get this paper published; it was considered uninteresting by the referee. And now, several years later, I also detect (what seems to be) a serious error in it. This general line of research may still, however, be of some…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to serious error found in main argument.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to similarity to Author's other paper

We prove that transversal non-simplicity is preserved under taking connect sum, generalizing Vertesi's result.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial theoretical error.

%auto-ignore This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s) since somebody do not agree with my idea.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to essential mistakes in some previous versions.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to an error in the proof of lemma 7.4. However, numerical evidence strongly suggest that this lemma is true.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a fatal flaw in the central proof.