Related papers: Reply to the Comment by S.E. Sebastian and N. Harr…
A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].
This is a comment on E. D. Greaves et al. paper. We argue that their laboratory experiment cannot be interpreted as measuring the one-way speed of light.
It is shown that the recent criticism of Brevik et al. (hep-th/0004041) is in error.
None. This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
The content of this page is no longer available
Our comprehensive analysis suggests the heating origin of key findings by the authors of the commented letter, hence rendering irrelevant their conclusions.
Reinhard Werner authored a comment on my paper "What Bell Did", disputing the conclusion and argumentation of the paper. This is my reply.
In my commentary, I will argue that the conclusions drawn in the paper "Noncommutative causality in algebraic quantum field" theory by G\'abor Hofer-Szab\'o (and similar publications) are incorrect. As proven by J.S. Bell, a local common…
Answer to cond-mat/0106005 and cond-mat/0106006 and additional notes are given concerning to my previous comment (cond-mat/0105324).
This short article was submitted to Nature Physics as a Correspondence. The intention was to provide a brief albeit significant criticism of the work of J. Dunkel and S. Hilbert, \textit{Consistent Thermostatistics Forbids Negative Absolute…
It is shown that the claims expressed in the Comment arXiv:0810.3247v1 against my paper Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 163603 (2008) [arXiv:0809.3901] are obviously wrong or not essential.
A recent Comment [arXiv:0811.2790] on the Letter 'Quantum Bounce and Cosmic Recall' by the authors is shown to arise from an incorrect understanding of the issues at hand and of our analysis. The conclusions of Bojowald's Comment are shown…
This is a reply to a comment on the paper arXiv:1204.2075 "Are stress-free membranes really tensionless ?" (EPL 95,28008 (2011)).
No abstract available, since this is a Comment on a published article (cf. title)
Paper withdrawn; ask me if you would like to know the details.
A reply to arXiv:0809.2310, "Comment on Universal Charge-Radius Relation for Subatomic and Astrophysical Compact Objects" [arXiv:0804.2140,PRL100(2008)151102]
We reply to recent criticisms of the SIMPLE project by J.I. Collar [arxiv:1106.3559]
Comment withdrawn. To be superseded by a subseqent paper.
This is a comment to an article by Laakso, Matthias and Jahn (arXiv:2008.11933).
This Comment has been withdrawn according to a mutual agreement between the authors of the original paper and the authors of this Comment.