Related papers: Comment on the numerical solutions of a new couple…
We show in this comment that the results obtained in a recent work by Yi et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 150406 (2004)] are quantitatively not correct and the proposed subsystem Berry phase is not well-defined.
It is shown that the criticism of Voitkiv [Phys. Rev. A 74, 027403 (2006)] is based on one assumption, which is false for an ionized electron, initially bound by the Coulomb potential, in a strong circularly polarized laser field. A certain…
We comment on a Letter by Vilar and Rubi [arXiv:0704.0761].
This paper addresses different aspects of "coupled" model descriptions in computational electromagnetics. This includes domain decomposition, multiscale problems, multiple or hybrid discrete field formulation and multi-physics problems.…
This technical report yields detailed calculations of the paper [1] (B. Bid\'egaray-Fesquet, "Stability of FD-TD schemes for Maxwell-Debye and Maxwell-Lorentz equations", Technical report, LMC-IMAG, 2005) which have been however automated…
Comment on F. Wilhelm et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 207202 (2001)
The results of a recent paper by D.J.Hinde et al., PRL 101, 092701 (2008) are discussed.
Correction to The Annals of Statistics (2006) 34, 1013--1044 [URL: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1151418250]
The main objective of this addendum to the mentioned article by Park is to provide some remarks on bifurcation theories for nonlinear partial differential equations (PDE) and their applications to fluid dynamics problems. We only wish to…
The author discusses integrability of Hamiltonian dynamical systems in the aftermath of KdV. The author also discusses the role of integrable systems in certain numerical computations, particularly the computation of the eigenvalues of a…
In the present note we introduce a new solution of this equation, lead- ing to a new integrable system with a quartic integral, which involves 16 free parameters. A special case of the new system admits interpretation in a problem of rigid…
A Comment on the Letter by Atsushi Ikeda and Kunimasa Miyazaki, [arXiv:1003.5472v2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 255704 (2010)].
Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.
It is shown that the argument presented in astro-ph/0307318 against the proof that the diluted limit of a self-gravitating system is ill behaved [Nucl. Phys. B668, 409 (2003) (astro-ph/0303301)] is misleading.
With regard to the recently published article, ``Y.-Q. Wang, et al., Physical mechanism of equiprobable exclusion network with heterogeneous interactions in phase transitions: Analytical analyses of steady state evolving from initial state,…
We call attention to a series of mistakes in a paper by S. Nam [JHEP 10 (2000) 044, hep-th/0008083].
The review paper by Zhang Zhi-Dong contains many errors and is based on several earlier works that are equally wrong.
I reply to the four points raised by S. A. Hayward, R. Di Criscienzo, M. Nadalini, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini (arXiv:0909.2956v1) against my comment (arXiv:0907.2020v1) to their previous article. I maintain my position on the wrongness of their…
The present paper is written in response to the comment of M. R. Hadizadeh et. al on our original paper "Solution of the Specific Model of Five-body Problem to Investigate the Effective Alpha-Nucleon Interaction in a Partial-Wave analysis"…
This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)