Related papers: Semigroups of Local Homeomorphisms
This paper has been withdrawn, because it is subsumed by the new preprint arXiv:0806.4540 .
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a critical error in the proof of Theorem A pointed out by Burkhard Wilking.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, since it has been merged with Part I (ID 0802.3570)
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due the final version in math.QA/0604564
I withdraw my paper from arXiv because there is a technical error in the proof of Theorem 1.1. And because of this error, all the results in the paper are untrue. I am very sorry for this.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to missing references to earlier work and an error in the interpretation of Figures 2 and 3. A corrected version is in preparation.
This paper is withdrawn because the results in the paper are included in a paper to be published in Mathematical and Computer Modelling.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author.
This submission has been withdrawn at the request of the author.
The paper has been withdrawn by the authors
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due to the existence of a much better paper in http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.CR/0207027
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to errors in Groebner basis calculations in the cases of five and six dimensional groups.
Paper withdrawn. There is a gap in the proof of Proposition 4.3 (its conclusion ``d'o\`{u} la proposition.'' is incorrect). Therefore theorems 1.1 and 3.1, which were the main results of the paper, are not proved.
This paper was withdrawn by the authors. The mistake in math.AG/0209223 affects also this paper.
This paper has been withdrawn
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s)
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to it contains some errors. A corrected treatment is presented in further publications of the author.
The paper has been withdrawn, since there is a mistake in Proposition 5.2. The result on the telescope conjecture for semihereditary rings is correct, but the characterization of the smashing subcategories of the derived category of…
This paper has been withdrawn due a crucial mistake due to a crucial mistake in the proof of Lemma 2.3.