Related papers: A componentwise version of Terao's conjecture
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn. It was an early draft submitted prematurely in error. A complete version is to be submitted shortly.
This paper has been withdrawn due to a critical error near equation (71). This error causes the entire argument of the paper to collapse. Emmanuel Candes of Stanford discovered the error, and has suggested a correct analysis, which will be…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. A substantially altered paper will be submitted incorporating major corrections, additions and improvements.
This paper has been withdrawn due to crucial errors.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to serious flaws in certain proofs. For instance, the method used to construct certain automorphic representations is flawed.
The paper was withdrawn because of its significant overlap with a paper appeared recently.
%auto-ignore This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a critical error in the proof of Theorem 5.4 on which the proof of the main theorem on the non-simplenss was based.
This paper is withdrawn.
The paper was withdrawn by the author. It contained various errors.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error in the proof of the main result. In a new manuscript (with two new authors) available at arXiv:1010.2791v1 this problem has been resolved.
This submission has been withdrawn at the request of the author.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), because it contains erroneous conclusion. Some part of the contents of the paper may be used in a future communication.
This paper has been withdrawn
The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in Proof of Theorem 1.1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.
This paper has been withdrawn because Proposition 2.2 (c) is false. This invalids the main results of section 2 and 3. We thank A. Canonaco for pointing us the error.