Related papers: A componentwise version of Terao's conjecture
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a likely hole in the proof.
This paper has being withdrawn by the authors due to an error in the conclusion.
The paper has been withdrawn due to an error in the main theorem.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a crucial error in the optimization. For the last one month I have been trying to remove the error, but it seems to take a lot of time so I decided to withdraw this paper for the moment.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial error in the data.
This paper has been withdrawn due to an error. We plan to replace it with a corrected version.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to an error in the proof of Theorem 3.8.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error estimate in Lemma 3.1.
The paper is withdrawn by the author due to a recently discovered flaw in a basic proof.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a mistake of factor 1/2.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a crucial mistake in proof of lemma 4.2.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1.
This paper is withdrawn because of an error in Lemma 3.1
Major mistake. The paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn due to an error, and no further revisions will be made.
This paper has been withdrawn while the author verifies the literature.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to numerical problems to get viable results.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author because Conjecture 1 is false. Please see arXiv:0901.2093 for a justification that Conjecture 1 is false. The other main results are also available from the above URL.
This paper has been withdrawn because there is a fundamental error in the computations; with the right computational scheme it seems to be just a version of the Jones polynomial