Related papers: Rejoinder on "Conjectures on exact solution of thr…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the version of [A complete proof of Hamilton's conjecture] at arXiv:1008.1576

We show that the criticism of our paper [Phys. Rev. B 65, 125109 (2002)] by Wang, Millis, and Das Sarma [cond-mat/0206203] is based on a trivial mathematical mistake they have committed.

We show that very clear answers to the queries raised by D. Chen and R. Ni in their Comment on our recent paper [A. Zaccone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 028002 (2022)] can be found in our original paper already. The paper [A. Zaccone, Phys. Rev.…

We show that arguments in the comment by Schwab et al. quant-ph/0503018 on our recent work are invalid.

A recent Comment [arXiv:0811.2790] on the Letter 'Quantum Bounce and Cosmic Recall' by the authors is shown to arise from an incorrect understanding of the issues at hand and of our analysis. The conclusions of Bojowald's Comment are shown…

This is an appendix to our paper "An update of the Hirsch Conjecture" (arXiv:0907.1186), containing proofs of some of the results and comments that were omitted in it.

We show that a conjecture of Einsiedler, Kapranov, and Lind on adelic amoebas of subvarieties of tori and their intersections with open halfspaces of complementary dimension is false for subvarieties of codimension greater than one that…

The conjecture that every modular lattice is integral is disproved.

This work is equivalent to that in {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 123}, 259401 (2019), however, Physical Review Letters prohibited reference to the additional two points in the analysis published by Zhu et al., in {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf…

In this short note the authors give answers to the three open problems formulated by Wu and Srivastava [{\it Appl. Math. Lett. 25 (2012), 1347--1353}]. We disprove the Problem 1, by showing that there exists a triangle which does not…

The said paper [Su2] entitled "Proof Of Two Dimensional Jacobian Conjecture" is false.

We offer a brief response to the criticisms put forward by Cusin et al in arXiv:1811.03582 about our work arXiv:1810.13435 and arXiv:1806.01718, emphasising that none of these criticisms are relevant to our main results.

A comment has been recently posted on the arXiv (arXiv:1902.07504) that discuss our recent work on encircling multiple exceptional points in Nat. Commun. 9, 4808 (2018). In that comment, the authors claim that our approach is prone to…

Two conjectures recently proposed by one of the authors are disproved

This paper has been withdrawn. (Reason) Its contents have been entirely superseded by the contents of the articles arXiv:0809.3444 and arXiv:0705.3070. There is no profitable reason to keep it alive. No material on it is however wrong.

I comment on Zaccone, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 128}, 028002 (2022) highlighting a flaw in the derivation that led to a spurious divergent factor. This renders the derivation of the random close packing density invalid.

Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)

It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

We report the conjectures on the three-dimensional (3D) Ising model on simple orthorhombic lattices, together with the details of calculations for a putative exact solution. Two conjectures, an additional rotation in the fourth curled-up…