Related papers: Perfect Secure High-Dimensional Quantum Bit Commit…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn. See quant-ph/9806031 for a discussion.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s).The scheme presented is insecure.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author since the protocol is not new. It is just the oldest version of BB84.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors,because the proposed protocol is still coverd by the no-go theorem of Mayers, Lo and Chau. We thank H-K. Lo and HF Chau for helpful correspondences.

This paper has been withdrawn: it does not evade the no-go results of Mayers, Lo and Chau, to whom I am most grateful for helpful correspondences.

This paper is withdrawn. See quant-ph/9806031 for a discussion.

The paper was retracted.

This paper has been withdrawn and replaced by quant-ph/0609207.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the incorrect argument for the security.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a oversimplified decoherence model. It will be substituted by a new work.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to the insecurity against attacks received in quant-ph/0605027v5.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn. The main technical result will reappear in the new version of quant-ph/0501003.

We spell out details of a simple argument for a security bound for the secure relativistic quantum bit commitment protocol of Ref. [1].

This paper has been withdrawn as it has been superseded by postings arXiv:quant-ph/0702147 and arXiv:0712.2935

This paper was withdrawn on 20.11.97.