Related papers: Repulsive electromagnetic stresses in the Casimir …
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because the paper is largely revised and improved, and to appear in Mechanics Research Communications.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author. The velocity structure of the broad-line region is reflective of the radiation pressure over much longer timescales than are probed by year-to-year changes in reverberation mapping results.…
This paper has been withdrawn due to crucial errors.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, since now all four parts of the review are available as a single file 0804.1639. I also made some revision of the text in order to avoid misprints and some inaccurate expressions.
This manuscript has been removed duo to incorrect contents.
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to numerical problems to get viable results.
This paper was withdrawn by arXiv admin due to authors' misrepresentation of identity/affiliation.
This paper was withdrawn by the authors due an error in the elimination of the front in the linearized interior equations (28)-(29).
The dielectric sphere has been an important test case for understanding and calculating the vacuum force of a dielectric body onto itself. Here we develop a method for computing this force in homogeneous spheres of arbitrary dielectric…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
We show that in order to account for the repulsive Casimir effect in the parallel plate geometry in terms of the quantum version of the Lorentz force, virtual surface densities of magnetic charges and currents must be introduced. The…
This submission has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators because it is a duplicate of 0705.0667.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in equation (51).
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error in eqn 27.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due to a crucial error in eq. 6.
There is a technical issue in the analysis that is not easily fixable. We, therefore, withdraw the submission. Sorry for the inconvenience.
This paper has been withdrawn. See v1 still available to understand the problem: Proposition 2.2 is false. The error in the proof is in claim (3). Then, the whole paper collapses. We do not have any correction for now. We apologize to…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to its publication