Related papers: Comment on "Universal Charge-Radius Relation for S…

A reply to arXiv:0809.2310, "Comment on Universal Charge-Radius Relation for Subatomic and Astrophysical Compact Objects" [arXiv:0804.2140,PRL100(2008)151102]

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the paper does not belong to Condensed Matter field.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to similarity to Author's other paper

%auto-ignore Paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because similar published work on the topic was overlooked. See S. Deser and A. Waldron, Nucl. Phys. B 631, 369-387 (2002).

This paper has been withdrawn since its content is included in the more general version arXiv:0804.1882

This paper has been withdrawn by the author. It will be posted on astro-ph once the proceedings of the 363rd Heraeus Seminar on Neutron Stars and Pulsars are ready.

This paper was withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author since the comments have been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to inconsistency of the considered working hypothesis. The consistent treatment is presented in the last publications of the author.

The paper has been withdrawn because a new, substantially revised version of the theory of neutron star radiation is completed by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn. A significantly revised version will be posted in the near future.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due to double submission. You can find it under: physics/0208019

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn because the content has been substantially improved in a later paper, arXiv:0806.1165.