Related papers: Rejoinder: The 2005 Neyman Lecture: Dynamic Indete…

Rejoinder to ``Boosting Algorithms: Regularization, Prediction and Model Fitting'' [arXiv:0804.2752]

Rejoinder of "Estimating Random Effects via Adjustment for Density Maximization" by C. Morris and R. Tang [arXiv:1108.3234]

Rejoinder of "Instrumental Variables: An Econometrician's Perspective" by Guido W. Imbens [arXiv:1410.0163].

Submitted to F. Schweitzer (ed.), Microscopic Models for Economic Dynamics, Lecture notes in physics, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2002.kiel.tex

Despite provable unknowables in recursion theory, indeterminism and randomness in physics is confined to conventions, subjective beliefs and preliminary evidence. The history of the issue is very briefly reviewed, and answers to five…

Rejoinder to "Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes" by A. C. Davison, S. A. Padoan and M. Ribatet [arXiv:1208.3378].

Rejoinder: Bayesian Checking of the Second Levels of Hierarchical Models [arXiv:0802.0743]

Rejoinder to "Feature Matching in Time Series Modeling" by Y. Xia and H. Tong [arXiv:1104.3073]

Discussions on indeterminism in physics focus on the possibility of an open future, i.e. the possibility of having potential alternative future events, the realisation of one of which is not fully determined by the present state of affairs.…

Discussion of "Likelihood Inference for Models with Unobservables: Another View" by Youngjo Lee and John A. Nelder [arXiv:1010.0303]

We make comments on the paper by Miller [{\it J. Theor. Biol.} {\bf 234} (2005) 511].

We comment on Z. D. Zhang's Response [arXiv:0812.2330] to our recent Comment [arXiv:0811.3876] addressing the conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model reported in [arXiv:0705.1045].

Lecture notes from a minicourse given at the ICTP in May 2002.

Brief recollections by the author about how he contributed to the production of the Feynman Lectures in Physics

Rejoinder to "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Research" by J. J. Goeman, A. Solari [arXiv:1208.2841].

Rejoinder to ``Breakdown and groups'' by P. L. Davies and U. Gather [math.ST/0508497]

Rejoinder: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]

In this rejoinder we summarize the comments, questions and remarks on the paper "A novel algorithmic approach to Bayesian Logic Regression" from the discussants. We then respond to those comments, questions and remarks, provide several…

Rejoinder: Monitoring Networked Applications With Incremental Quantile Estimation [arXiv:0708.0302]

This paper has been withdrawn because the content has been substantially improved in a later paper, arXiv:0806.1165.