Related papers: Comment to: "A note on failure of the ladder appro…
Recent Lattice QCD results relevant for Kaon, Charm and B Physics are summarized. There is general agreement among calculations using a wide range of different lattice actions. This bolsters confidence in the lattice results and in their…
We present an extension of the quasiparticle self-consistent $GW$ approximation (QS$GW$) [Phys. Rev. B, 76 165106 (2007)] to include vertex corrections in the screened Coulomb interaction $W$. This is achieved by solving the Bethe-Salpeter…
This note points out a gap in the proof of one of the technical results in the paper "Asymptotic Invariants of Base Loci", that appeared in Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 56 (2006), 1701-1734. We provide a correct proof of this result.
In this work, we show that the proof of the main result in [An Application of Hayashi's Inequality for Differentiable Functions, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 32 (6) (1996), 95--99, by R.P. Agarwal and S.S. Dragomir] was wrong.…
We correct a partial mistake for a metric presented in the article "Lattice constellation and codes from quadratic number fields" [IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 47, No. 4, May. 2001]. We show that the metric defined in the article is not…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the formulation.
A recent paper by Herbut in J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. {\bf 29}, 1 (1996) is shown to contain an internal inconsistency which invalidates the principal conclusion of the paper that the magnetic penetration depth diverges with an XY-exponent…
In this Comment, we refute conclusions made in Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 233601 (2014) by L.-G. Wang, L. Wang, M. Al-Amri, S.-Y. Zhu, and M. S. Zubairy. These conclusions stem from the use of the linear theory, which is not applicable to…
We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]
Isospin symmetry is explicitly broken in the Standard Model by the non-zero differences of mass and electric charge between the up and down quarks. Both of these corrections are expected to have a comparable size of the order of one percent…
This paper has some inconsistent results, i.e., we made some failed claims because we did some mistakes for using the test criterion for a series. Precisely, our claims on the convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(1/t)$ of SGD presented in…
The statement of Lemma 3.1 in the published paper is not correct. Lemma 3.1 is needed for the proof of Theorem 3.2. Theorem 3.2 as originally stated is true but its "proof" is not correct. Here we change the statements and proofs of Lemma…
First version: del Barco et al. submitted recently a comment [arXiv:0812.4070] on our latest Phys. Rev. Lett. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 237204 (2008)], claiming three basic mistakes. We show here that their claims are unjustified and based on…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to serious flaws in certain proofs. For instance, the method used to construct certain automorphic representations is flawed.
In a recent article [Phys. Rev. A 86, 024302 (2012)], the authors have derived some hierarchy relations between geometric discord and entanglement (measured by negativity and its square). We point out that these results are incorrect and…
An error occurred in the computation of a gradient in our paper entitled "Blind maximum likelihood separation of a linear-quadratic mixture", presented in ICA'2004. The equations (20) in Appendix and (17) in the text were not correct. The…
The purpose of this note is to rectify a typographical error in the statements of Theorems 5.5 and 5.6 of Sharma, Chauhan and Singh[3] and further analyze and discuss the significance of the results derived in Takieldin and Sol\'e [4]. In…
There is an error in the main result. We provide an easy generalization to the irreducibility criterion in the title.
Two recent articles by Norman H. March that contain misleading statements concerning 3D Ising models, partly based on earlier erroneous work of Z.D. Zhang, are addressed.
We show that Zhang Degang's claimed solution of the three-dimensional Ising model [arXiv:2110.11233] has fatal irreparable errors.