Related papers: Comment: Bayesian Checking of the Second Levels of…
Comment: Bayesian Checking of the Second Levels of Hierarchical Models [arXiv:0802.0743]
Rejoinder: Bayesian Checking of the Second Levels of Hierarchical Models [arXiv:0802.0743]
Comment: Bayesian Checking of the Second Level of Hierarchical Models [arXiv:0802.0743]
Hierarchical models are increasingly used in many applications. Along with this increased use comes a desire to investigate whether the model is compatible with the observed data. Bayesian methods are well suited to eliminate the many…
We discuss the methods of Evans and Moshonov [Bayesian Analysis 1 (2006) 893--914, Bayesian Statistics and Its Applications (2007) 145--159] concerning checking for prior-data conflict and their relevance to the method proposed in this…
Comment on ``Microarrays, Empirical Bayes and the Two-Groups Model'' [arXiv:0808.0572]
Comment on ``Microarrays, Empirical Bayes and the Two-Groups Model'' [arXiv:0808.0572]
Comment on ``Microarrays, Empirical Bayes and the Two-Group Model'' [arXiv:0808.0572]
Comment on ``Boosting Algorithms: Regularization, Prediction and Model Fitting'' [arXiv:0804.2752]
Rejoinder to ``Microarrays, Empirical Bayes and the Two-Groups Model'' [arXiv:0808.0572]
Usually one compares the accuracy of two competing classifiers via null hypothesis significance tests (nhst). Yet the nhst tests suffer from important shortcomings, which can be overcome by switching to Bayesian hypothesis testing. We…
Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]
Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]
Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]
Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]
Comment on ``Lancaster Probabilities and Gibbs Sampling'' [arXiv:0808.3852]
Discussion of "Bayesian Model Selection Based on Proper Scoring Rules" by Dawid and Musio [arXiv:1409.5291].
Discussion of "Bayesian Model Selection Based on Proper Scoring Rules" by Dawid and Musio [arXiv:1409.5291].
Comment on ``On Random Scan Gibbs Samplers'' [arXiv:0808.3852]
We clarify a number of points raised in [Matias, arXiv:cond-mat/0507471v2 (2005)].