Related papers: Plane Jacobian problem for rational polynomials
This paper has been withdrawn as the statements in Proposition 4.4 and Theorem 1.4(i) are not correct.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. We have discovered an error in the evaluation of the diagram, which invalidates our conclusion.
The paper has been withdrawn because the proof of part (b) of the main theorem is incomplete.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to necessity of revision.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to errors in the figures.
This paper has been withdraw by the auhor due to a mistake in classification of the algebra
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to inconsistency of the considered working hypothesis. The consistent treatment is presented in the last publications of the author.
The paper has benn withdrawn because the computation of the external virial contains an error which invalidate the main result.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author in favor of a stronger result proven by the author with R. Frank and T. Weidl in arXiv:0707.0998
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to a critical error stemming from the defined template.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to need of essential revision.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to an error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the Proof of Theorem 0.3
Withdrawn by the authors due to an error in the proof of the finite field result (Thm. 1.5): The random primes used in the proof need NOT avoid the exceptional primes from Lemma 2.7, thus leaving Thm. 1.5 unproved.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because M. Aschenbrenner pointed out that the proof of theorem 3.1 was incorrect.
This paper has been withdrawn, as all conjectures (and one claim) have been proven incorrect. Some of what remains may eventually reappear in a different context.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the presented idea is wrong.