Related papers: Quantum algorithm for the longest common subsequen…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to errors in the figures.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, since it has been merged with Part I (ID 0802.3570)

This paper has been withdrawn at the request of one of the authors.

This paper was withdrawn by the authors.

This paper is withdrawn. We found a mistake in Lemma 4.1

This paper is withdrawn.

This paper is withdrawn because the results in the paper are included in a paper to be published in Mathematical and Computer Modelling.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial theoretical and experimental error.

This paper summarizes a quantum algorithm of [R.D. Somma, et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 130504 (2008)] that simulates a classical annealing process for solving discrete optimization problems. The complexity of the quantum algorithm scales…

This paper has been withdrawn by author due to an error in the proof.

The paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because the authors excluded the paper from electronic proceedings of the conference.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, because a better treatment is given in the author's Phd. thesis (Sections 3.4.6 and 4.4), now available on the arxiv.

This paper has been withdrawn due to non-clearness of some technical points, as well as lack of a reasonable statement of quantization conjecture.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a more research needed to estimate $h^{*}_{n}(b)$ which really should be written as $h^{*}_{n}(b,A)$ for $b\in \Gamma (t)$.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the derivation.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to need of essential revision.