Related papers: Algorithmic Arithmetic Fewnomial Theory I: One Var…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to a crucial error in the proof of Lemma 3.1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author. The statement of the Main Theorem but is wrong in general, there have been provided counterexamples. The main theorem only holds conditionally, under the finiteness statement of theorem 2.8.
This is an addendum to a previous article, which aims to provide the proofs of some results in that paper (Theorem 7.5 and Proposition 9.15) which were removed from its final version. The reason for such omission is that these proofs follow…
This paper has been withdrawn due to a critical error discovered in Theorem 4.21. Anyone with a historical or pragamatic interest in prior "negative results", however - e.g., failed proof attempts relating to the (in)consistency of ZF or…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a sheaf-theoretic error, in the end of the proof of the main theorem.
This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial error in the proof of the main theorem
I withdraw my paper from arXiv because there is a technical error in the proof of Theorem 1.1. And because of this error, all the results in the paper are untrue. I am very sorry for this.
We prove a function field analogue of Maynard's result about primes with restricted digits. That is, for certain ranges of parameters n and q, we prove an asymptotic formula for the number of irreducible polynomials of degree n over a…
Paper withdrawn. There is a gap in the proof of Proposition 4.3 (its conclusion ``d'o\`{u} la proposition.'' is incorrect). Therefore theorems 1.1 and 3.1, which were the main results of the paper, are not proved.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of Theorem 6.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in an inequality in the proof of Theorem 1.1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake in one of the main lemmas.
It is shown that the condition of Theorem 1 in [1] never holds in practice and that Theorem 2 is incorrect under the stated condition. Extra assumptions or/and modifications are needed to make the conclusions of Theorem 1 and 2 above valid,…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due to a flaw in the proof of Theorem 1. This preprint is superseded by quant-ph/0610027, where a correct proof can be found. Thanks to Rainer Siegmund-Schultze for spotting the error.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a gap in the proof of Theorem 6.1. The gap was discovered by M. Van den Bergh. Theorem 6.1 is used to prove the main result of the paper, namely Theorem 0.7 (decomposition in arbitrary…
This is an erratum to the article: "Computation of maximal projection constants" (J. Funct. Anal., 277). The statement of Lemma 3.1(2) of that paper is incorrect. As a consequence of this the proof of Theorem 1.4 is incomplete. In this…
We consider non-linear changes of variables and Fubini's theorem for certain integrals over a two-dimensional local field. An interesting example is presented in which imperfectness of a finite characteristic local field causes Fubini's…
We give a new proof of Fitzgerald's criterion for primitive polynomials over a finite field. Existing proofs essentially use the theory of linear recurrences over finite fields. Here, we give a much shorter and self-contained proof which…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the main proof (thanks to Carlos D'Andrea)