Related papers: Some bijections on set partitions

This text highlights issues present in the proof of Lemma 6.10 of the Baumgartner (1943 -- 2011) article "Almost disjoint sets, the dense set problem and the partition calculus" of 1976, and intends to present a correction at the same time…

The paper has been withdrawn, since there is a mistake in Proposition 5.2. The result on the telescope conjecture for semihereditary rings is correct, but the characterization of the smashing subcategories of the derived category of…

Although the results are correct, it was pointed out that the results follow from some previously known results. Accordingly, this version of the paper is withdrawn by the authors.

We present a bijection between non-crossing partitions of the set $[2n+1]$ into $n+1$ blocks such that no block contains two consecutive integers, and the set of sequences $\{s_{i}\}_{1}^{n}$ such that $1 \leq s_{i} \leq i$, and if…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial argument error at p.10.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the proofs. The error has been corrected and the paper has been expanded in arXiv:0910.5327

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because there is a gap in Lemma 9.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a sheaf-theoretic error, in the end of the proof of the main theorem.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of Theorem 6.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to a significant error in section 4.3.1.

New version of my 1998 article. The method of proof of the main results follows the original, but there are many simplifications/streamlining of arguments, especially Lemma 3.6 (new Lemma 3.7). Fixed small error in proof of lower bound for…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to serious flaws in certain proofs. For instance, the method used to construct certain automorphic representations is flawed.

Paper withdrawn - lemma 4.1 was false. Quite a lot of changes need to be made!

This paper has been withdrawn, since it contains a corollary with impossible consequences and the source of an error is currently unknown.

This paper has been removed by the author due to a misstatement in Theorem 1 and a gap in its proof. A corrected and largely extended successor (a joint work with Thomas Bauer and Tomasz Szemberg) can be found under math.AG/0312211,

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial theoretical error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a crucial mistake in Lemma 2

Paper withdrawn. Error lemma 7.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due an error in the proof.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in Thm. 11.