Related papers: Counterexample to a geodesic length conjecture on …

The paper is withdrawn because the analysis appeared to be incomplete.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to some errors.

Paper withdrawn due to error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due to double submission. You can find it under: physics/0208019

The paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to it being fundamentally flawed. The author apologizes for any inconvenience it may have caused.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a the manuscript error.

This paper is being withdrawn because an error was discovered in lemma 4.3. Although the rest of the paper appears to be correct, this error invalidates the proof of theorem 3.1 and theorem 3.3.

This paper has been withdrawn due to an incorrect analysis in Section 4.

There are several serious errors in this paper. I thought to have time to fix it, but it did not occur for years. So I withdraw this paper.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because eq.(4) and those subsequent are incorrect.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to some errors.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in Proof of Theorem 1.1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because Conjecture 1 is false. Please see arXiv:0901.2093 for a justification that Conjecture 1 is false. The other main results are also available from the above URL.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the presented idea is wrong.

The paper was withdrawn because of its significant overlap with a paper appeared recently.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

The author has withdrawn this submission.

We withdraw the paper because the results are wrong.

This paper has been withdrawn, pending revision of the main conclusion, in the light of the criticism of cond-mat/0302043.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a crucial error.