Related papers: Effective resistance on random electrical networks

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to some errors.

We withdraw the paper because the results are wrong.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of Theorem 6.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error

This paper has been withdrawn

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of Proposition 4.8.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to numerical problems to get viable results.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to necessity of revision.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in the proof of the main result.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the presented idea is wrong.

The paper has been permanently removed due to copyright issues.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the force equation.

The paper is being withdrawn. A new submission will follow.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by author due to an error in the proof.

This paper was withdrawn by the authors. Lemma 5.1 is wrong.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, since now all four parts of the review are available as a single file 0804.1639. I also made some revision of the text in order to avoid misprints and some inaccurate expressions.

In an earlier paper~\cite{Luu:2019jmb} we discussed emergence from the context of effective field theories, particularly as related to the fields of particle and nuclear physics. We argued on the side of reductionism and weak emergence.…

The paper is suspended. The reason: as was noted by prof. H. Esnault, Theorem 2.1.1 of the previous version (as well as the related Theorem 6.1.1 of http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/math/pdf/9908/9908037v2.pdf of D. Arapura and P. Sastry) is wrong…