Related papers: Reply to Comment by J.A.Garcia, arXiv:0705.0143 (t…
This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)
This reply contains a brief response to the comment by R. Howl, D. R\"atzel, and I. Fuentes [arXiv:1811.10306]
In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).
Using a very small sample of 8 datasets it was recently shown by De Visscher (2011) that the g-index is very close to the square root of the total number of citations. It was argued that there is no bibliometrically meaningful difference.…
Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely consulted by researchers and sometimes used in research evaluations, there is no recent or systematic evidence about the differences between…
The study of highly cited documents on Google Scholar (GS) has never been addressed to date in a comprehensive manner. The objective of this work is to identify the set of highly cited documents in Google Scholar and define their core…
Reply to Ikeda (arXiv:0712.3341).
A large number of published studies have examined the properties of either networks of citation among scientific papers or networks of coauthorship among scientists. Here, using an extensive data set covering more than a century of physics…
We reply to P. Forg\'acs, T. Herpay, and P. Kov\'acs (arXiv: 1202.6289).
Reply to `Comment on "Gapless Spin-1 Neutral Collective Mode Branch for Graphite"' by Peres et al [cond-mat/0312263].
We refute the criticism expressed in a comment by P. Talkner and P. H\"anggi [Phys. Rev. E 102, 066101 (2020)] on our paper Phys. Rev. E 101, 050101(R) (2020). We first make clear that our paper is free of any technical mistakes. We then…
Amato et al.[arXiv:1205.6418] maintain that certain data published in Carpinteri et al.[2] are not the result of independent measurements, and are in any case affected by uncertainties such that our conclusions are not valid. We will…
This paper has been removed by arXiv administrators because it plagiarizes gr-qc/0011087, gr-qc/0205028, gr-qc/0404108, gr-qc/0212018, and gr-qc/0011027.
This thesis investigates in the use of access log data as a source of information for identifying related scientific papers. This is done for arXiv.org, the authority for publication of e-prints in several fields of physics. Compared to…
We find evidence for the universality of two relative bibliometric indicators of the quality of individual scientific publications taken from different data sets. One of these is a new index that considers both citation and reference…
This is a brief response to a recent posting by Gross.
Collaborative edition is achieved by distinct sites that work independently on (a copy of) a shared document. Conflicts may arise during this process and must be solved by the collaborative editor. In pure Peer to Peer collaborative…
The main objective of this paper is to empirically test whether the identification of highly-cited documents through Google Scholar is feasible and reliable. To this end, we carried out a longitudinal analysis (1950 to 2013), running a…
This paper has been removed by arXiv administrators because it overlaps gr-qc/0303009, hep-th/0405047, gr-qc/0412120, and others. This paper also has excessive overlap with the following papers also written by the authors or their…
A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al