Related papers: Reply to Comment by J.A.Garcia, arXiv:0705.0143 (t…

We offer a brief response to the criticisms put forward by Cusin et al in arXiv:1811.03582 about our work arXiv:1810.13435 and arXiv:1806.01718, emphasising that none of these criticisms are relevant to our main results.

It is shown that the Comment by Phair et al. on PRL 77, 3514 (1996) does not challenge the paper by Tõke et al. It is, in fact, consistent with all conclusions of the targeted paper. The Comment disputes claims never made.

In their comment[1] on our Letter [arXiv:0907.0767], Leggett and Garg claim that they have introduced in their original paper (LG1) a dependence on measurement times. They also claim that Eqs.(HMDR1) and (LG2a) can therefore not be linked…

We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]

Statements included in the comment published by Schumann et al. (arXiv:1904.03023v1) are contradicted by documents that were communicated to one of the co-authors of the comment (Dr. Koester). These documents are reviewed but cannot be…

John Morgan and G,Tian pointed out a mistake in the concluding argument for our paper entitled "$C_1$ in [2] is zero", which was recently published in arXiv:1512.02098. We hereby acknowledge this mistake and correct the computation, leading…

It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…

Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)

In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].

This is a comment on the paper arXiv:1410.2840 by Ji and Jin, to appear in the AOAS.

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

This is a reply to Professor Yehia Comments in arXiv:1305.0026

The authors of the Comment ascribe us claims never made while moderating their own previous unsubstantiated statements.

This is no longer available.

Comment on "Citation Statistics" [arXiv:0910.3529]

Comment on "Citation Statistics" [arXiv:0910.3529]

It is demonstrated that remarks and criticism in work [1] (arXiv:1005.2436 nucl-th) have resulted from inattentive reading of work [2] (Phys. Rev.C 81, 035501 (2010)) or just some misunderstanding and do not influence conclusions of work…

We have carefully examined all the points raised by Drummond in his response hep-th/0608109 to our paper hep-th/0606265 wherein we had made some criticisms of his earlier work hep-th/0411017. We concede that Drummond is correct in claiming…

Marchildon's claim (quant-ph/0007068) regarding Ghose's papers (quant-ph/0001024 and 0003037) is shown to be erroneous.

We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).