Related papers: On the Energy-Momentum Problem in Static Einstein …

This paper has been withdrawn due to upload of another version of it as a new preprint: gr-qc/0404097

Paper withdrawn. Replaced by by gr-qc/0212077 .

This paper is a set of notes that we wrote concerning the first version of Emergent Gravity [gr-qc/0602022]. It is our version of an exercise that we proposed to some of our students. The idea was to find mathematical errors and…

Several energy-momentum "tensors" of gravitational field are considered and compared in the lowest approximation. Each of them together with energy-momentum tensor of point-like particles satisfies the conservation laws when equation of…

They are possible other cases at first done not contemplate. This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1 page 4

This paper was withdrawn by arXiv admin due to authors' misrepresentation of identity/affiliation.

Starting from the energy-momentum of matter and gravitational field in the framework of General Relativity and Teleparallel Gravity, we obtain the energy-momentum complex in flat FRW spacetime. We show that the complex vanishes at…

This paper has excessive overlap with the following papers also written by the authors or their collaborators: gr-qc/0502059, gr-qc/0502061, gr-qc/0510037, gr-qc/0510038, gr-qc/0207026, and others.

This paper has been withdrawn. (Reason) Its contents have been entirely superseded by the contents of the articles arXiv:0809.3444 and arXiv:0705.3070. There is no profitable reason to keep it alive. No material on it is however wrong.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because of copyright reasons.

This comment has been withdrawn by the authors due to crucial error.

This article has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators due to excessive unattributed and verbatim text overlap with the pre-existing Wikipedia article on redshift

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. Significantly revised versions of the results of this paper are now available in arXiv:0707.0487v2 and arXiv:0808.3169v1.

Draft of book strictly based on the author research results presented in the arXiv papers: 0906.3827[gr-qc], 0906.3825[gr-qc], 0905.3916[hep-ph], 0902.4811[hep-ph], 0902.2829[hep-th], 0812.0551[hep-th], 0809.5216[gr-qc], 0808.1035[gr-qc],…

This submission has been withdrawn by arXiv admins because it contains inappropriate overlap with arXiv:physics/0603087.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because similar published work on the topic was overlooked. See S. Deser and A. Waldron, Nucl. Phys. B 631, 369-387 (2002).

Both Poincar\'e in his 1900 Festschrift paper \cite{Poincare} and Einstein in his 1905 \textsl{Annalen der Physik} article \cite{Einstein} were led to $E=mc^2$ by considering electromagnetic processes taking place in vacuo. Poincar\'e's…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because eq.(4) and those subsequent are incorrect.

A detailed re-examination of the seminal paper on special relativity, taking into account recent work on the physical interpretation of the space-time Lorentz transformation as well as the modern understanding of classical elecromagnetism…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because of copyright reasons.