English

Yamaji effect in models of underdoped cuprates

Strongly Correlated Electrons 2026-05-29 v4

Abstract

Recent angle-dependent magnetoresistance measurements in underdoped cuprates have revealed compelling evidence for small hole pockets in the pseudogap regime, including observation of the Yamaji effect in HgBa2_2CuO4+δ_{4+\delta} (Chan et al., Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-025-03032-2 (2025)). A key distinction between theories is their predicted Fermi volumes, measured as fractions of the square lattice Brillouin zone: p/4p/4 per pocket for spin density wave (SDW) versus p/8p/8 for fractionalized Fermi liquid (FL*), where pp is the hole doping. We calculate the cc-axis magnetoresistance ρzz(θ,ϕ)\rho_{zz}(\theta, \phi) within the semiclassical Boltzmann formalism for both states, and using the ancilla layer model (ALM) for FL* in a single-band Hamiltonian. The results from the FL\text{FL}^* phase show good consistency with current experimental data. Conversely, the results for the SDW phase are highly sensitive to the ordering momentum along the zz-direction. An ordering vector of Q=(π,π,π)Q = (\pi, \pi, \pi) yields predictions that starkly disagree with the experiment. The only possibility for agreement within the SDW scenario is to assume an ordering momentum of Q=(π,π,0)Q = (\pi, \pi, 0). However, even in this specific case, the SDW scenario predicts a marginally smaller Yamaji angle at ϕ=0\phi=0 than the FL* theory, and a second Yamaji peak near in-plane angle ϕ=45\phi = 45^\circ, which was not observed in the experiment. In reality, the N\'eel ordering vector is likely uncorrelated between adjacent layers, so that there is no coherent interlayer transport of hole-pocket quasiparticles in the SDW scenario, and consequently no Yamaji effect. Our results support the FL* interpretation of Fermi arcs in the pseudogap phase, and establish Yamaji angle measurements as a discriminatory tool between theoretical models.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2510.13943,
  title  = {Yamaji effect in models of underdoped cuprates},
  author = {Jing-Yu Zhao and Shubhayu Chatterjee and Subir Sachdev and Ya-Hui Zhang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13943},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

15 pages, 13 figures