Worst-case vs Average-case Design for Estimation from Fixed Pairwise Comparisons
Abstract
Pairwise comparison data arises in many domains, including tournament rankings, web search, and preference elicitation. Given noisy comparisons of a fixed subset of pairs of items, we study the problem of estimating the underlying comparison probabilities under the assumption of strong stochastic transitivity (SST). We also consider the noisy sorting subclass of the SST model. We show that when the assignment of items to the topology is arbitrary, these permutation-based models, unlike their parametric counterparts, do not admit consistent estimation for most comparison topologies used in practice. We then demonstrate that consistent estimation is possible when the assignment of items to the topology is randomized, thus establishing a dichotomy between worst-case and average-case designs. We propose two estimators in the average-case setting and analyze their risk, showing that it depends on the comparison topology only through the degree sequence of the topology. The rates achieved by these estimators are shown to be optimal for a large class of graphs. Our results are corroborated by simulations on multiple comparison topologies.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1707.06217,
title = {Worst-case vs Average-case Design for Estimation from Fixed Pairwise Comparisons},
author = {Ashwin Pananjady and Cheng Mao and Vidya Muthukumar and Martin J. Wainwright and Thomas A. Courtade},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06217},
year = {2017}
}